T.+Henderson



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHAnqEGm4Co

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qk4N5kkifGQ

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

media type="youtube" key="pQjqxayxwt4" width="560" height="315"

Tim Minchin- In this video Tim explains that he made an assumption that if you are an ice cream man, than you are a pedophile. This is good example because there are many factors that play into being a pedophile, and owning an ice cream truck is not one. Thus the orders of events would be; Tim owns an ice cream truck- Tim is a pedophile-therefore all ice cream truck owners are pedophiles.

media type="youtube" key="rsI36TzIikY" width="560" height="315"

West Wing- In this video the assumption being made is that they do not do well when they campaign in Texas because they look stupid in funny hats. This is a fallacy because people do not base their political opinion of someone based solely upon how they look in a large, funny hat. So the fallacy would be as follows, The president looks weird in funny hats- The president did not do well in the Texas election- Therefore Texans did not support him because they did not like his hat.

Hamlet allusions- https://soundcloud.com/user-432124596/hamlet-allusions