B.+Johnson

media type="custom" key="27774175" Begging the Question- A fallacy that restates in other words the premise in the conclusion. Theses fallacies try to give reasoning by saying the same thing over again but in different wording in the conclusion to explain its claim. These do not give any real reasoning why the argument is valid. The conclusion is open to question and does not back up the premise good enough. media type="youtube" key="gSJD6wDiYP4" width="560" height="315" Anna comes to Britney and tells her she is a good cheerleader because she can do a good back handspring. Then when Britney tells Anna that does not make her a good cheerleader, Anna replies with begging the question saying she has a good back handspring that makes her a good cheerleader. By Anna switching the claim and the conclusion and having no true evidence on her claim this does not leave for a persuasive argument. Anna is begging the question by her claim on whether Britney is a good cheerleader or not because she can do a good back handspring. media type="youtube" key="sSFZvR-ssuk" width="560" height="315" The argument presented in this video is whether God is real or not. The talk show people do not believe in God while the caller does. The caller tries to back up his reasoning with Bible quotes but as we know, this is not a good enough reasoning of why God is real. If the Bible is said to be written by God then how would we know God is real or not? It begs the question by the conclusion being the same as the premise. The caller does not explain why the Bible is true and should justify his claim on how God is indeed real instead of begging the question.