B+Saunders

media type="youtube" key="03mfbsPXFR0" width="560" height="315" The first two links to the iCarly web videos are an example of Part for the Whole fallacy because in the first link Carly and Sam explain all the good things about the new Tech Foots. Carly and her friends were paid to advertise the new Tech Foots, however after the iCarly cast go about wearing the tech foots they realize all the negative things about the shoes. So the first video is an example of this fallacy because In the first video Carly and Sam mention true, fancy features of the shoe and make the whole about the whole shoe generalization. They only say the good examples for owning the merchandise and avoid any negative aspects the shoe has in order to sale the Tech Foots.

My second video connects with the Part for the Whole fallacy because the video claims positive reasons for smoking cigarettes, but we all know many negative aspects to smoking.

http://www.icarly.com/iVideo/video_1441-carly-and-sam-talk-about-their-new-fave-shoes-tech-foots-of-course-this-was-b4-they-realized-tech-foots-bite/chan_1http://www.icarly.com/iVideo/video_1439-carly-sam-and-freddie-show-you-all-the-reasons-you-should-not-buy-tech-foots/chan_1https://youtu.be/YQhYxrF9RXQ